|
|
|
October 30th, 2009
05:42 pm - Risk: statistics vs psychology I don't think it's a big secret anymore that (untrained) human beings are lousy at statistics, and in particular, that intuitive perceived risk has very little to do with actual risk.
This article provoked me into a big think about it. I'll say up top: I have not done any research on HPV vaccines and cervical cancer rates, so I have no opinion on the bulk of the article - it may in fact be the case that there's no particular benefit to getting vaccinated against HPV (although it would surprise me a bit).
But it was a paragraph near the end that grabbed my attention: Dr. Harper also participated in the research on Glaxo-Smith-Kline’s version of the drug, Cervarix, currently in use in the UK but not yet approved here. Since the government began administering the vaccine to school-aged girls last year, more than 2,000 patients reported some kind of adverse reaction including nausea, dizziness, blurred vision, convulsions, seizures and hyperventilation. Several reported multiple reactions, with 4,602 suspected side-effects recorded in total. The most tragic case involved a 14 year-old girl who dropped dead in the corridor of her school an hour after receiving the vaccination.
Now I don't think there's any doubt that Natalie Morton died from a massive undiagnosed tumour, and it was most likely coincidence that she'd had the HPV vaccine that same day. (I'll note that in fact she died in hospital, some hours after the jab, but let's not get the facts in the way of a good whipping-up of public anxiety. I'll also note that there have been no other UK deaths even mentioned in the same breath as HPV vaccine, so it must be Natalie Morton who is being referred to in this paragraph.)
What I'm fascinated by is the way that when Natalie Morton was rushed to hospital and tragically died, the fact that is immediately fixated on is that she was vaccinated the same day. And there are clearly a lot of people out there who have put vaccination into a risk category such that any adverse health effect around the same time is ascribed to the vaccine - the whole MMR-autism travesty can basically be put down to the fact that MMR vaccine is given around the same age that autistic children show the first obvious symptoms. And the great thing about statistics is that you can use them to demonstrate that it's correlation, not causation.
Whereas from my point of view: suppose in fact HPV vaccine had killed Natalie Morton. Now, because it wasn't anaphylactic shock (which is a known problem, and mass vaccination programs have protocols in place to deal with it), we have some new, mysterious way to die within a few hours of a jab. It can't be a general vaccine problem, because Natalie Morton seems to have had her shots as a child. And I, and all the other girls in my school, lined up for rubella shots at the same age. If it's HPV-specific, it would be ... startling* ... if it killed her alone, and didn't cause lesser problems in a larger number of other vaccinated individuals. Since apparently 1.4 million girls have been vaccinated recently in the UK, I'd expect a pattern of specific side effects within a few hours to have been noticed and reported by now, but everything that gets mentioned are either known vaccine issues, not HPV-specific, or, to be blunt, anxiety reactions.
I mean, I'm pretty good at anxiety reactions myself, I'm not knocking the unpleasantness of them. But the fact that I'm having an anxiety reaction is, as I know from experience, not at all a reliable guide to how much danger I'm actually in. It is a very reliable guide to how much danger I think I'm in, either consciously or subsconsciously. I don't happen to think vaccines are all that risky (mostly, your immune system is barely going to notice, relative to all the other crap it has to deal with). I'm gathering from articles like this, and the whole set of assumptions underlying it, that I'm rather unusual, or at least becoming increasingly rare.
*Or it triggered something very specific in her case, to do with her very specific condition, in which case, who knows what else might have been a trigger? Blaming the HPV vaccine is hardly rational, given her massive undiagnosed chest tumour was probably going to kill her soon in any case.
This entry is originally published at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/73316.html. Please go here to read comments; here to leave a comment (you can use your LJ OpenID). comments so far.
|
October 24th, 2009
12:15 pm - alt.polyamory snark I can't afford to post this in alt.polyamory, but I have to vent my snark at Steve Pope somewhere.
I am so glad that we all know that Steve Pope has such high ethical principles around issues of consent that there couldn't possibly be anything problematic about him effectively telling sexually harrassed women to suck it up because other women elsewhere have it worse. (Oh, and one should never use one's ethical principles to do anything that might infringe in any way, or express any disapproval of, sexual harrassment. It's more important to let the victims know they're privileged, relatively speaking.)
I am genuinely pleased he has chosen never to have children. However bizarre I find his reasoning, he has reached a conclusion there I am very happy about.
And I am finding his focus (obsession?) on the exploitation of sex workers more and more yucky. He gives the impression he has never knowingly spoken to (listened to) a sex worker. I suspect that is because if he interacted with sex workers, he might be mistaken for the kind of man who pays for sex, and that would just be too hard on his high ethical principles.
This entry is originally published at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/72736.html. Please go here to read comments; here to leave a comment (you can use your LJ OpenID). comments so far.
|
October 1st, 2009
10:24 am - Fictional Muslims and their actors While doing deepad's survey here I surprised myself by discovering that my first-thought fictional Muslim is Nazim Talawi, from The Eagle, a Danish crime investigation show and the follow-up to Unit One (which I reviewed in the past). It was also broadcast on SBS, so if you're English-speaking, the subtitled DVDs are available, although USAians note: in PAL format.
I'm not sure why my brain leapt for him first; possibly because he's one of the few fictional Muslims I've encountered in Western media who is part of the "good guys" team. His religion isn't important, it's just taken for granted. His background growing up in the Danish middle-Eastern community is used in several stories as he has a lot of insider contacts. It's possibly stereotyping that those insider contacts overlap quite a bit with the criminial world. It's certainly deadbrowalking territory that he's the team member who gets killed in the second-last episode just to show we're dealing with the really big bads now.
So while I was googling around and pondering how many other people who don't live in Denmark might conceivably know of Nazim Talawi, let alone think of him when asked to name fictional Muslims, I found an interesting article featuring the actor, Janus Bakrawi (even if you can't read Danish, it's a great photo of him).
Background: "Livvagterne" (The Bodyguards) is a new Danish TV show, and apparently makes a trilogy with "Rejseholdet" (Unit One) and "Ørnen" (The Eagle). I expect it'll be on SBS in due course. Denmark consists of Jutland, a peninsula on top of Germany; and a large assortment of islands (200 inhabited, over 2000 total), the largest of which, Sjælland, has Copenhagen (the capital). Also Janus Bakrawi is the son of a Polish mother and a Palestinian-Jordanian father, but was himself born in Denmark. In terms of traditional Danish bigotry, a Pole is very nearly as foreign as a Palestinian-Jordanian although I imagine that is changing with the EU etc.
A rough translation of the article: Janus Bakrawi is tired of the fact that ethnic roles [in Denmark] are for "thematic" reasons, rather than ordinary people. While Sven Clausen, producer of "Livvagterne" is complaining there aren't enough ethnic actors to fill all the roles in the hit show, Janus Bakrawi attributes the lack of interest to the fact that the ethnic roles are mainly bad guys. "You don't want to be seen as the problem all the time. Some ethnic actors don't want to be part of "Livvagterne" because the brown roles are all problematic. I'd like roles that aren't all about the ethnicity."
But that's unlikely to happen anytime soon. Sven Clausen: "Action shows are about creating dramatic situations. So you could ask if we're not making it dramatic, and the answer is yes, or the show becomes incredibly boring [Oh, I wish English had words like "møgkedeligt"]. As long as we're doing these kinds of stories, and depicting the present, we're going to use Jutlanders, Christians, Sjællanders, Muslims, in situations that happen in the real Denmark."
Sven Clausen gets a gigantic RaceFail from me. I don't imagine ethnic and immigrant Danes actually contribute more to modern Danish crime problems than "indigeneous" Danes, although it's pretty obvious that they feature more heavily in the media beatups about crime. It's the classic "those other strange people are dangerous, not us" story. I bet you could make a fabulous, "reality-based" action show set in Denmark that treated immigrants and ethnic Danes sympathetically.
I hit some further RaceFail when I investigated "Livvagterne" a bit more. It appears that one of the three central characters is meant to be a Muslima or at least a middle-Eastern woman (the character's name is Jasmina el Murad), but the actress they cast is Danish-Faeroese!
It's a real shame, because I did like Nazim Talawi and thought on the whole he was a very positive sign that Denmark was moving towards being less racist. And because I otherwise like these shows - with middle-aged women, their wrinkles visible, having plausible careers; among characters who don't all look like they belong on magazine covers. I guess I'll have to become a Janus Bakrawi fan instead.
This entry is originally published at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/72082.html. Please go here to read comments; here to leave a comment (you can use your LJ OpenID). comments so far.
|
September 28th, 2009
11:42 am - Life or some semblance thereof I went away on Cycle Queensland. Overall, I had a great time.
It's still fun to cheer cyclists, I am still amazed at how easy it is for me to make a fool of myself like that in comparison to other people, and it was particularly gratifying to have a cyclist come up and specifically thank me for my spanish dancing on our "Spanish" cheering day. Considering I was improvising everything including the dance, and annoyed at how sneakers do not make any noise when you stamp your feet.
It's also a weird kind of fun hauling around speakers and laying out cables. I became the one who always got to handle the longest speaker cable, because it was also thicker than the other cables and I could just barely hold it myself when it was almost all wound up. And you get so much better at it over a week.
I even handled our one episode of rain and mud gracefully - it wasn't nearly as bad as Pomona last year. In fact, you could fairly quickly tell who'd been on last year's ride, because we all went "this is nothing, you should have been in Pomona" when the newbies went "Eek, mud everywhere". Also, it conveniently rained (and mudded everything) while we were in Dalby and there was a lot more undercover in Dalby showgrounds than most of the other sites. We did have a very cold spell overnight, even to frost on our tents in Warwick. I can now nod knowingly when the nightly weather predicts the coldest Queensland overnight for Warwick.
It was also still easy to forget/ignore online existence - in fact I adapted quicker than last year (maybe because I knew I'd cope). That's even part of the reason I didn't come straight back to DW after coming back. The other reasons have been catching up on sleep and other business, as well as buying a new bicycle, which I hope to get this week.
In the meantime, spring has hit in a major, major way. Last week we had about eight kookaburras flying around our and the surrounding back gardens, making a lot of noise and hopping from branch to branch. I've never heard kookaburras make so much noise during the day (normally you only hear them at sunrise and sunset) so I'm guessing there was some matchmaking going on. This fits in with my observation of a lot of young kookaburras last spring/summer, which I attribute to the drought breaking and thus more food for the raising of kookaburras.
Also, our pepparina tree is flowering, and we've had a few rounds of noisy day visitors (lorikeets) followed by noisy night visitors (flying foxes) although the flower crop doesn't sound as totally irresistible as some past years. And now the jacarandas are flowering, and the silky oaks. They are really incongruous together, and yet I've obviously seen them flower together enough years now that they're a strong "Brisbane Spring" marker for me, and the blue and gold are an acquired taste I don't regret acquiring. They both came in strongly almost immediately our big dust storm on Wednesday had moved on. We seem to have been lucky in this house, with relatively little dust to clean up.
I think the time has also come to start anti-liveblogging my experiences at the beginning of this year. I had an unplanned pregnancy, much soul-searching, and after deciding to keep it, miscarried anyway. I'm going to write in much more detail, but I will tag it all "anti-liveblogging" and cut-tag the actual entries to spare the sensitivities of people who are having trouble conceiving and all those who aren't as fascinated by bodily workings as I am.
This entry is originally published at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/71692.html. Please go here to read comments; here to leave a comment (you can use your LJ OpenID). comments so far.
|
September 3rd, 2009
12:56 pm - Ranty ranty ranty I really need to be getting myself ready for this* so after this post I will not be around DW/LJ until about the 15th September.
But steam keeps escaping when I read stuff like this. There is no science anywhere I can detect in Kruger's claims. There are a bunch of preposterous claims that have never stood up to any testing of any part of it. I hope all the people who are doing good work in this sort of area have stopped calling themselves "evolutionary psychologists" by now because the mere phrase sets off alarm bells and flashing lights in my head.
I think the report is also incredibly irresponsible in that the psychologist interviewed talks about what might be plausible diagnoses for Garrido, but his interview is framed in the context of "it might be schizophrenia", when Levin is clear (as am I from my much more limited knowledge of mental illness) that Garrido's behaviour has nothing to do with schizophrenia. It's not as though it's not a difficult enough condition to live with, no, each new social horror has to be linked with the condition in the public imagination.
Generally, I am really bothered by how someone called "Jeanna" managed to write an entire article that treats women as less human than men: She quotes Kruger without comment when he says This relates to a long, long human history of women basically being reproductive assets and being seen as resources that are taken in conflicts both within groups and between groups, and follows up with her own Humans aren't the only animals to kidnap and commit sex acts against females. She changes her phrasing just in time to say Tagging someone a sociopath or a future sex offender when he or she is just a kid is daunting at best just before getting more quotes from Levin who seems to think this is a male-enough phenomenon to say "men", "guys", "boys".
And in counterpoint to the idea that it's evolutionary somehow to find teenage girls sexy, I think about how historically in European culture, often the most admired and sexually desireable women were of a certain age. And I do wonder if white western culture's current obsession with young women, and ignoring of older women, and pressure on older women to look younger with hair dye, surgery, and placebos from beauty counters, might not parallel the growth of feminism and women's access to political life and independence.
When women can't directly threaten your power and money, you (stereotypical western culture male) can admire them freely, but as women have gained equal access (at least legally) to these things, older women, being more experienced, knowledgeable, and understanding of social dynamics, become proportionately more dangerous (if you're a stereotypical western culture male who's concerned about his power and status) than young women. Teenage women are cute and defenseless by comparison. I don't think there's anything genetic about finding that sexy.
* Easter egg: I am in one of the photos on that page.
This entry is originally published at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/71634.html. Please go here to read comments; here to leave a comment (you can use your LJ OpenID). comments so far.
|
September 2nd, 2009
12:23 pm - Because I have the icon Anyone who still thinks the BU researchers who've been failing and failing might be well-intentioned and have some kind of clue what they're talking about, and are not such utter victims of their own oblivious heterosexual male clueless privilege that they have no business doing any research about the human brain whatsover, is invited to read this.
There Are No Words (apart from all the smart comments in response).
ETA Both researchers have recently-set-up LJs: ogi_ogas, saigaddam. The "bio" for saigaddam is so special I am going to copy it here, because I'm afraid it's soon going to be gone:
We now operate in a prodigious universe of data. As the content of our lives is continuously transformed into bit streams of information, machine learning and data mining technologies discern our needs, desires, and preferences with ever greater accuracy.
Four billion years of tinkering has allowed us humans to thrive in a dynamic, data-rich environment. Many of these evolutionarily gathered tools can be put to use in navigating a fast expanding virtual world. Discernible Preferences will document insights accrued while wrangling data from this philosophical paddock.
I don't think I know of a way to mock this that surpasses the original.
This entry was originally posted at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/71319.html. Please comment there using OpenID.
|
August 18th, 2009
05:15 pm - Last Enemy Here at home, we've just watched The Last Enemy for the last few days. I have precisely these reactions:
( And they are totally, utterly spoilerific ) Nice try, but Fail.
(yes, I visited an actual, perfectly nice park that happens to be called "Fail Park" on the weekend. May need to do more work on the icon.)
This entry was originally posted at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/70358.html. Please comment there using OpenID.
|
July 31st, 2009
01:02 pm - My first personal encounter with scientific racism I guess this is sort of for International Blog Against Racism Week (the "global" theme sure didn't hurt), and part of my decision, as a result of RaceFail, to think hard about science, the cultural assumptions underlying it, and the ways that can go wrong, particularly in racist/colonialist ways. Admittedly, this is in some ways an easy cop-out - a story of blatantly obvious wrongdoing by another white scientist - but I don't think I've ever talked about this, and I have to start somewhere.
I'm putting the actual story under cut, because some people may find it distressing, triggery or unsafe for work. It also makes me reluctant to directly nominate it for IBARW. ( Carleton Gajdusek ) *The Wikipedia entry says his name was Daniel Carleton Gajdusek. To my knowledge, he was always called Carleton Gajdusek, and preferred D. Carleton Gajdusek on scientific papers.
This entry was originally posted at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/69566.html. Please comment there using OpenID.
|
July 27th, 2009
03:09 pm - Sign of life I've been in a bit of a depressive dip recently, but I'm in the process of pulling myself out (and it does feel like it's working) and I understand at least part of what pulled me down that I wasn't aware of at the time, which is helpful.
I hope to pull myself up to a level where I can post some actual content again soon.
This entry was originally posted at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/68842.html. Please comment there using OpenID.
|
July 10th, 2009
09:10 am - Samson and Delilah So I finally got to see Samson and Delilah last night. Wow! I fully understand why it got the Caméra d'Or at Cannes, because I have trouble imagining I'll see a better film this year at least.
( Review of sorts, spoiler-free, but the movie does show drug use, death, and violence ) I give it five stars: I recommend it to people interested in Australia, Indigenous people's lives, and/or the art of cinema. I don't recommend it universally, because I can see a lot of people are not willing or able to make the leap into its world, and it's just wasted on them.
This entry was originally posted at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/68358.html. Please comment there using OpenID.
|
June 25th, 2009
11:19 am - On the wallaby Wallabies get high eating opium poppies, jump around creating "crop circles". I'd find that story hard to swallow in a work of fiction.
(I have some work I have to get done. More substantial posting will have to wait.)
This entry was originally posted at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/67794.html. Please comment there using OpenID.
|
June 16th, 2009
01:36 pm - Thoughts actually related to RaceFail I think it's interesting that in the week since I posted my apology, the corner of fandom I can see from here has become intensely focussed on issues of gender, and particularly rape and rape culture. I think these are important discussions to have, certainly. But I also hope that rosefox is not the only white woman who is comparing and contrasting her experiences as a woman in a rape debate, with her experiences as a white person in a race debate, and is taking away from it some useful thoughts for dealing with RaceFail.
I came up with a metaphor for how I now see (white) fandom with respect to race, and wrote it up over here as part of sqbr's discussion of derailing.
Whitefandomstania is applying for membership of the UNF (United Nations of Fandom). The UNF says "sorry, you're going to have change your treatment of immigrants and refugees first".
Whitefandomstania natives try to have a conversation about immigrants and refugees and how they're treated in Whitefandomstania. It's quite painful, particularly as there's a significant fraction of WFS nationals who don't think there's any particular problem. At some point, one of the WFS nationals who does think immigrants could be treated better, think they notice a pattern: WFS who think immigrants could be treated better are more likely to wear bright colours, while the ones who don't think there's much of a problem wear subdued colours.
The inhabitants of WFS are now caught up in this (to them) very exciting discussion about groups differences within WFS, whether these groups even exist, what the differences consist of, with the attitudes towards immigrants and migrants seen as an incidental side effect of some more fundamental differences in the WFS identity.
And the UNF are tapping their feet, saying "guys, we don't care how excited you are about this internal discussion, when are you going to start treating immigrants and refugees to meet UNF standards? Do you even want to join?"
As sqbr and I went on to discuss, there's a significant difference in power dynamic here, but that's intentional: it was important to me to "get" how whitecentric I and my commenters were being. And yet if you look at a country like the US, its relationship to the UN often appears to the outsider to be unbalanced in this "what happens in our country is at least as important as the rest of the world combined" way, so that doesn't harm the thinking for me at all - I've just got to decide whether I am a chauvanistic citizen of WFS or one who prefers to think a bit more globally. I accept that I'll always be a citizen of WFS, but hope to perhaps be invited to UNF nations as a visitor - I don't think heading there as a tourist is okay, because tourism == cultural appropriation here.
So anyway, I am now a lot less interested in WFS internal politics and trying to think more about what I as a citizen can do towards getting the country accepted by UNF. As long as WFS as a nation insists its treatment of immigrants is a minor detail of an internal identity matter, I need to speak up inside WFS at least.
What I intend to do: I want to focus more on my own actual interests around science (because there are plenty of people writing fanfic as far as I'm concerned) and do so more thoughtfully, more conscious of my own perspective, the possible perspectives of my audience, and general awareness of and respect for all kinds of peoples.
This entry was originally posted at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/67437.html. Please comment there using OpenID.
|
June 13th, 2009
03:48 pm - Brainfog I have reached the conclusion that I'm sick, and have been for the last several days. It's somewhere on the cold-flu spectrum, but involves almost no runny nose which is in large part why it took me so long to figure out (because for me, those things are nearly always mostly about a runny nose). The other part of the reason is that whenever I try to think about anything for very long, I'm reminded that my head hurts, so I've not been thinking much at all. The final confirmation was that I slept for over 12 hours last night.
This entry was originally posted at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/67257.html. Please comment there using OpenID.
|
June 8th, 2009
12:17 am - An apology I would like to apologise to sparkymonster and anyone else who was upset or offended or otherwise less than happy about my An Abstract of an Essay. As sparkymonster kindly pointed out to me, the post is not about race or RaceFail, but the way I wrote it makes it look like it ought to be about RaceFail. In fact, it's a post by a white woman from a white perspective, that only addresses a white audience.
I do think that discussions of race in fandom are important, and it is important they not be derailed, and to the extent I contributed to that, I apologise. I know race discussions have come up time and again in fandom, and I am coming to understand how painful/angry-making/frustrating/tiring it is for PoC and allies to have to do the same thing every year or every few months with so little change in white fandom's attitudes. So even if the current RaceFail has quietened down, it is simply not appropriate for me to link the word "RaceFail" with a post that is not only not about race issues in fandom, but exists within a white frame of reference.
( this is not part of the apology, but something I need to write down with the knowledge that it may be read by other people )
There may be something of value in my Abstract of an Essay. It may even be salvageable to include a proper consideration of race. I am not currently capable of judging that, because right now I am ashamed of it, and far too aware of my racism101 status, and how much time it will take me to rectify that. I will not delete it, because I dislike how other white people have deleted or locked their Fails, and because I think there is value for me personally to have this reminder. Instead, I will edit it to add a link to this post at the top.
I intend to continue participating in RaceFail, in the sense of reading and listening to the voices of PoC, being conscious of race issues and white privilege in books/media I consume, and speaking/writing as I am able to, which at least currently is confined to comments, thanking contributors or pointing out derails.
This entry was originally posted at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/66993.html. Please comment there using OpenID.
|
June 5th, 2009
01:34 pm - SPON/PPMB ETA: Please read this before this post. Note that this is not a post about RaceFail.
Since I'm being asked a lot, this is a reference post I can link to.
SPON stands for Scary Ponies Oh No. PPMB stands for Pretty Princess Monsters Blargh.
They are (deliberately) unhelpful names for what appear to be two groups in fandom which are currently in conflict, for example via RaceFail. Invented at the end of this comment, in response to a long post trying to describe the groups and their differences, because the previous labels for the groups such as "book fandom" and "media fandom" are highly unsatisfactory for a number of reasons.
As always of course, these are not absolute groups - people may belong somewhat to one or the other or both or neither and probably change status with time. But quite a few of us can see some trends which we're trying to define and describe, hence the weird and I believe totally arbitrary labels.
I'm afraid they're not totally arbitrary to me, because I needed to find some way to remember who was who when I first started reading discussions (a whole oh! four days ago) using these terms. My introduction of non-arbitrariness is that the Scary Pony is Elizabeth Bear's character Whiskey, the kelpie that takes (black) human form in Blood and Iron, as critiqued by Avalon's Willow here where there's also a lot of mention of monsters, which may make Avalon's Willow a Pretty Princess Monster, but I'm not going to label her for her. The PPMB do seem to be friends with a bunch of Orcs, anyway.
As I define the groups, I identify more with the Pretty Princess Monsters Blargh, but since I'm now out in the fringes of analytic critique I suspect I may actually be turning into that Berserker Valkyrie I threatened the world with when I broke up with rasfc. And Beserker Valkyries seem like a useful, nicely symmetrical counterbalance to the older generation of SF fandom who the Scary Ponies Oh No are liberal in response to, who don't have a name. I think of them as the Reactionary Pigs and that just proves I should not be naming them.
This entry was originally posted at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/66644.html. Please comment there using OpenID.
|
11:54 am - Intellectual arrogance ETA: Please read this before this post. Note that this is not a post about RaceFail.
As a follow-on from this (which I forgot to crosspost: I am primarily posting in Dreamwidth and if you're in doubt about which to link, please link the DW version) and to record these thoughts since I've finally begun to expressing them. ( this got really long _again_ and it is still at the abstract stage. )
This entry was originally posted at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/66361.html. Please comment there using OpenID.
|
June 3rd, 2009
11:51 am - An Abstract of an Essay ETA: Please read this before this post. Note that this is not a post about RaceFail.
My head is full of thoughts and ideas, partly based on my RaceFail readings, particularly thrown up by oliviacirce's big post about RaceFail, WisCon, and family fights, but also based on my rasfc experiences, mixed in with some other thinky thoughts about Fandom I've had for a while, based eg on ellen_fremedon's Id Vortex. And I think I have to get them all out, but I'm worried if I did it properly, it would be the size of a PhD thesis and take weeks just to get all the links and references, and in addition to writing this post today, I need to clean the kitchen, get exercise, and do some job hunting. So like my man Darwin, this will be just the summary notes of the full thing, however long the summary notes turn out to be.
( Deep breath, here we go ) Okay, on with the rest of my day.
This entry was originally posted at http://aquaeri.dreamwidth.org/65936.html. Please comment there using OpenID.
|
May 25th, 2009
02:04 pm - Squee! I just heard that the Camera d'Or, the prize for best first film at Cannes, has been awarded to Warwick Thornton for Samson and Delilah.
If, as a result of RaceFail for example, you'd like to support non-white art making, how about a first film by an Australian Aboriginal director, based on his own life experience, starring previously-unknown Aboriginal actors. With, now, an international award.
I haven't actually seen it yet myself because it's showing on only one screen in Brisbane at the moment. I expect this award means it'll come to a lot more cinemas, and between that and getting on top of our flooding problems, I'll have a viable chance to get out to see it.
Back to sorting through old papers that got wet.
|
May 24th, 2009
08:24 am - Temporary retirement I'm going to have to pull back from my online commitment, particularly my participation in RaceFail, because I don't have the time or energy to devote to it at the moment.
We thought we'd escaped fairly lightly from the heavy rain earlier this week, which did involve a temporary small creek running through our garage. Yesterday we discovered that part of the carpet in the adjacent entertainment area was completely soaked, and we're having to expend some major effort to dry it out and generally move things around, check for water damage, etc. At this point, we hope we'll be able to keep the carpet, but I don't have experience with this.
It's certainly where I need to devote most of my time and energy for the foreseeable future.
|
May 22nd, 2009
10:31 am - Genocide: the definition I can't believe I have to do this, but I am willing to do it. For all the nitpickers, here is the real, true, one-and-only definition of genocide. Unlike most words, genocide was invented by a specific person, (Raphael Lemkin, at a particular time and place which means it does have one authoritative definition. It's in the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide:
[...] any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
From the Wikipedia article on genocide I'd like to note the following quote from Lemkin, indicating that Lemkin himself did not think genocide required actually killing people:
Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.
(The quote can be read in full context here.)
So, have we all got that: genocide does not mean literally killing people. It means destroying (killing) a "nation"; culture or ethnicity or race. Killing all the people who belong to it is only one option for achieving that end. I do not believe genocide is a less horrific crime when attempted by removal of children from their families and culture than by actual murder, but rather that the second type of genocide is accompanied by additional, more severe crimes, namely murder rather than abduction.
Now I need to go do something pleasant, like clean the kitchen.
|
|
|